objekts

objekts / Menu

objekts / 2026

Voting

Three films, three production challenges: character continuity, controlled facial transformation and musical movement. Final films and their development on one page.

Stepan, Thriller and Choir are working titles.

How the scene was developed

Stepan

One character’s adventure: scale, physical action and continuity between scenes.

Frame from the final film · 0:24Stepan frame: the character in the courtyard.
01

Scale without changing the character.

Face, wardrobe and space had separate references. The character needed to remain recognisable between settings, without a background reference imposing another pose or camera angle.

Inside development

The project bible separated the comedy of scale from the scene’s overall physics. Camera, character position, props and surrounding reactions were reviewed separately, so unusual height did not turn the entire world into arbitrary fantasy.

Frame from the final film · 0:56Stepan frame: action following the pool scene.
02

Each shot remembers the last.

After the water, a new scene cannot restart with a dry shirt. Wardrobe and physical state were planned in sequence, from dry and creased to wet and partly dried.

Inside development

The review protocol separately tracked the shirt print, hands, contact with props, movement direction and scene geography. This controls a sequence, rather than merely selecting an attractive isolated image.

02

Thriller

How the scene was developed

A psychological scene held together by faces, pauses and reactions—not just transformation.

Frame from the final film · 0:24Thriller frame: a close-up within the office scene.
01

The effect starts with a reaction.

A pause, a glance, breathing, an approaching camera. Panic was directed progressively: the effect should change the character’s state, not replace the person or break the action with an abrupt jump.

Inside development

For one shot, the starting image and final framing were specified separately. Between them came breathing, eye movement and a gradual change of expression. This directs a transition rather than simply asking for a scarier image.

Frame from the final film · 0:31Thriller frame: the character and reactions in a shared space.
02

The face stays locked.

Transformation does not erase age or facial features. Directions separately constrained identity changes, arbitrary deformation and unwanted cuts. Cool light and surrounding reactions connected the shots.

Inside development

Working records describe constraints for individual shots. They are not a complete edit log or proof that every early version entered the final film. The images shown here come from the supplied final master.

03

Choir

How the scene was developed

A musical sequence: individual characters, different settings and one shared rhythm.

Frame from the final film · 0:05Choir frame: a solo scene by the window.
01

Music directs the movement.

Not generic lip movement, but a specific musical phrase. Articulation, consonants, vowels and breath were tied to the audio: sound defines the timing rather than accompanying arbitrary expressions.

Inside development

Development separately reviewed performer identity and the relationship between movement and voice. Changing the musical excerpt affects articulation and editing, not just the soundtrack.

Frame from the final film · 0:23Choir frame: a group scene in a sunlit hall.
02

Together does not mean identical.

A choir is not a set of identically moving copies. Characters were specified separately; ages, faces and small individual movements preserved differences. Light, wardrobe and space brought the group together.

Inside development

Revision directions separately changed the microphone, shirt colours and group movement. These changes must remain separate from people’s identity and room geometry: different clothing should not create a different cast.